From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: macOS metal rendering engine in mac port Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 14:50:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <279F3242-E556-42C9-8489-4DD8F538938E@gnu.org> <83bl8zc8ku.fsf@gnu.org> <834kerc6jo.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2c3ar5d.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1hvaps2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23208"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: aaronjensen@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 25 21:50:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lld48-0005mx-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 21:50:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33316 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lld47-0002xY-Ig for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:50:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lld2u-0001BZ-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from ip6-2001-8b0-3f8-8129-3812-ca8c-5d63-4c9c.holly.idiocy.org ([2001:8b0:3f8:8129:3812:ca8c:5d63:4c9c]:59009 helo=breton.holly.idiocy.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lld2r-0007Fl-73; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:48:55 -0400 Original-Received: by breton.holly.idiocy.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 239B4202C275D3; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:50:14 +0100 (BST) Mail-Followup-To: Alan Third , Eli Zaretskii , aaronjensen@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83r1hvaps2.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: none client-ip=2001:8b0:3f8:8129:3812:ca8c:5d63:4c9c; envelope-from=alan@breton.holly.idiocy.org; helo=breton.holly.idiocy.org X-Spam_score_int: 11 X-Spam_score: 1.1 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269889 Archived-At: On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:47:41PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 14:34:37 +0100 > > From: Alan Third > > Cc: aaronjensen@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > FWIW, on the Mac I see a slightly smaller performance penalty with > > display-line-numbers-mode, around 18%. > > Is that an optimized build or unoptimized? In my tests with optimized > builds, line numbers add about 10% to 12% to the scroll benchmark. > Unoptimized code shows almost no effect: around 2%. In both cases the default, so -O2. -- Alan Third