From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [GNU ELPA] New package proposal: aggressive-completion.el Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 13:07:12 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87o8evok58.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9217"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Tassilo Horn To: Manuel Uberti Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 03 12:08:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lSdD0-0002Jd-KX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 12:08:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSdCz-00008g-Mu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 06:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSdCH-00089I-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 06:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:44795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSdCF-0004Gu-PN; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 06:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.42]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001E1D8.0000000060683E80.00003EEB; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 03:07:59 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Manuel Uberti , Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267328 Archived-At: * Manuel Uberti [2021-04-03 12:13]: > On 03/04/21 09:53, Tassilo Horn wrote: > > I've used several different minibuffer completion frameworks in the past > > (including ivy, raven, and selectrum) in the past but always came back > > to the standard emacs minibuffer completion with its nice configuration > > means in terms of `completion-category-overrides' and friends. > > Hi Tassilo, > > FWIW this has appeared recently: minicomp[1]. > > It relies on Emacs internals only for completion, maybe it is worth checking out? > > I've been using for a couple of days now and I like it's minimalistic approach. > > Note that it may not be what you are after, though. I just wanted to offer > another recent alternative. > > [1] https://github.com/minad/minicomp Thank you Manuel, I have briefly tested minicomp. Yet it requires wildcards to complete. aggressive-completion-mode is like plain Emacs, helping to complete faster with less keys and user may move into the completion buffer just as usual. Good features. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman https://rms-support-letter.github.io/