From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:06:14 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87czvxunu5.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15117"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 19 08:09:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lN9Fp-0003qa-U5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 08:09:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43414 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lN9Fo-0007l0-Ts for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 03:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lN9Ez-0007MC-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 03:08:13 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:59797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lN9Ey-0002jm-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 03:08:13 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.30]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 0000000000027F39.0000000060544DD9.00002372; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:08:08 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Kangas , Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266582 Archived-At: Content-Type: text/enriched Text-Width: 70 * Stefan Kangas < [2021-03-18 16:40]: > Jean Louis < writes: > > >> facemenu makes some sense in enriched-mode (it's probably the only mode > >> where it does make sense), but I'm not sure the `M-o' binding is ideal. > >> Sticking it under `C-c C-<' might be better. > > > > Sounds complicated. > > Why is it more complicated than any other mode that puts bindings under > C-c C-<? Too many key strokes. Compare it: - M-o b -- it is quick and easy to make face bold. - C-c C-o b -- is 3 key strokes And I was thinking C-c will be reserverd for users.