From: Alan Third <alan@idiocy.org>
To: Evgeny Zajcev <lg.zevlg@gmail.com>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>,
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>,
emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Image transformation filter for upscaled images
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:28:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEc/xYNHv/2YNYhc@breton.holly.idiocy.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO=W_ZomVTuDHoBE6B7JeZy2F0RmnqMX9MyNCAVCSTYSXLsJug@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:34:28AM +0300, Evgeny Zajcev wrote:
> вт, 9 мар. 2021 г. в 00:59, Alan Third <alan@idiocy.org>:
>
> > As for default behaviour, I'm inclined to stick with what we have
> > where scaling down uses best and scaling up uses nearest neighbour but
> > any use of :filter (or whatever) over-rides the default. Anyone have
> > an opinion? Do we just want to use best everywhere by default?
> >
>
> I vote for "best" everywhere by default, making doc-view shine out-of-box
This might be a stupid question, but would it not make more sense to
teach doc-view to generate images that are the correct resolution
already? That would make it look much better than any scaling option.
--
Alan Third
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-07 19:12 Image transformation filter for upscaled images Evgeny Zajcev
2021-03-07 20:45 ` Alan Third
2021-03-07 22:35 ` Evgeny Zajcev
2021-03-07 23:27 ` Stefan Kangas
2021-03-08 0:42 ` Evgeny Zajcev
2021-03-08 2:31 ` Stefan Kangas
2021-03-08 13:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-08 13:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-08 18:58 ` Alan Third
2021-03-08 19:18 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-08 21:27 ` Alan Third
2021-03-08 21:31 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-08 21:59 ` Alan Third
2021-03-09 8:34 ` Evgeny Zajcev
2021-03-09 9:28 ` Alan Third [this message]
2021-03-09 9:46 ` Evgeny Zajcev
2021-03-09 14:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-03-09 13:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-09 13:48 ` Evgeny Zajcev
2021-03-09 13:59 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-09 16:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-09 17:04 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-09 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-10 4:23 ` Yuri Khan
2021-03-10 14:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-09 13:16 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-09 13:50 ` Dov Grobgeld
2021-03-09 18:16 ` Alan Third
2021-03-09 18:12 ` Alan Third
2021-03-09 22:31 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2021-03-09 23:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-03-10 13:37 ` Alan Third
2021-03-10 14:49 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-10 21:45 ` Alan Third
2021-03-11 16:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-12 1:38 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-03-12 2:01 ` Evgeny Zajcev
2021-03-12 18:32 ` Alan Third
2021-03-08 20:05 ` Evgeny Zajcev
2021-03-08 21:29 ` Alan Third
2021-03-08 13:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-07 23:12 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YEc/xYNHv/2YNYhc@breton.holly.idiocy.org \
--to=alan@idiocy.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=lg.zevlg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefankangas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).