From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:19:45 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12467"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, kevin.legouguec@gmail.com To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 09:23:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lATk4-000388-P9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:23:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34170 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lATk3-0001fN-R9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:23:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lATiu-0000IX-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:22:44 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:51593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lATis-0003Eh-26; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:22:43 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.3]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001E079.0000000060263ACD.0000386C; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:22:37 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Ergus , Eli Zaretskii , kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264465 Archived-At: * Ergus [2021-02-04 01:38]: > I think Gregory already proposed the best approach, but now people are > arguing about Magit, projectile or philosophical questions. > > IMHO, I would prefer that after a deadline you make a decision (even if > it is the opposite to what I expect) and close it. Otherwise it becomes > a never ending collections of emails with no final results... I can understand that you had a purpose of discussion and such is probably reflected in the subject. Your focus is or was on the purpose. But then many people participate introduced various useful details. That makes the discussion informative, thought provoking and educational. I learn about other people's habits in using Emacs and their thoughts in developments. References to manuals then help me make better decisions on key bindings in packages I am developing.