From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:05:43 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, kevin.legouguec@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 09:08:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lATUr-0006T8-ST for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:08:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53910 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lATUq-00051C-Up for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lATUL-0004aP-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:07:41 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:52413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lATUK-0005QR-9J; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:07:41 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.3]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001DFF5.0000000060263749.00003693; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:07:37 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Ergus , kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264462 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2021-02-03 21:15]: > > Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:01:42 +0100 > > From: Ergus > > Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org, > > kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org > > > > > > > >> IMO, the binding should be removed until/unless > > >> the discussion here leads to a decision to add > > >> it back again. > > > > > >Please wait till the discussion comes to its conclusion. > > > > In my short experience here; when discussions start like this; then > > there is never a conclusion. They just slowly stop and no change is made > > at the end. I someone insists after some time, the again the same... > > > > In 3 years I have more than 30 examples... > > I don't think I understand what you are saying. You started this > discussion. If you don't like how discussions happen here, why did > you start it? https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/users-lightbulb.html