From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 2c74924: * etc/MACHINES: Document that we support AArch64 with macOS. Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:56:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210131185114.23801.85391@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210131185115.B6A3C20DF3@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14549"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Philipp Stephani , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 01 00:57:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6MbM-0003hF-7J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:57:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35730 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6MbL-0007K4-9x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 18:57:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6MaO-0006qy-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 18:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: from outbound.soverin.net ([116.202.65.218]:50913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6MaL-0008E3-GR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 18:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3235D600C9; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=idiocy.org; s=soverin; t=1612137410; bh=OQmyZqvbZVepMmwhNA1WDDVKEOqQvU1UHL0BoE1BOWA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=l6G+lu7NCTD39Xx60hceBA5CWz2oBF3csomMuY78XAPjsRcjmKG7fP4L67KaoI5/e Z7bQ5I0fHRl7WQHyrjo6P71c7BrUBl1itsTh2MchbhkcYsCe73BwgILiURdLEs8eYu DkYFPfKeUKBTp5Lhq7dMPZJ2jwf2Ou3JkcDLAQ9Yeq+Y4Zm5yi0fWY4RmvjALfaE1B N1/K5w2l/qVHbxKzQWycN8Z/lcjzI9NhSnFITPpOqp/TuVRJdWJ45XjPB2al9GtQ8t j1f+dy/DghhbdWLJDwZX0UcaoeghdChg7uxXJKxJLaVEODCGOQTOz2dPV0Ix9X+kuG bO9hFnFmUHXgQ== Original-Received: by breton.holly.idiocy.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5203B202A1630C; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:56:47 +0000 (GMT) Mail-Followup-To: Alan Third , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Philipp Stephani Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.65.218; envelope-from=alan@idiocy.org; helo=outbound.soverin.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263678 Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 05:06:44PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Officially, yes, but some people apparently manage to run 10.6 on > > powerPC. I don't know if we really need to specify that, though, given > > that it's almost certainly a tiny subset of a tiny subset of people > > running macOS, and they can't reasonably be expecting official support > > for their project. > > Interesting. Makes me wonder, tho: why would Emacs not work on such > a system? I understand that with the old unexec there was a good chance > that it wouldn't work without explicit work on our part, but the "p" of > "pdump" should avoid those problems ;-) Yeah, I was thinking that. I can't think of any reason it wouldn't work with the exception of some NS specific image format code (PBM or something?) where I think we recently switched from big-endian to little-endian. But given it took us years to notice that was broken, I can't see it causing any problems. :) -- Alan Third