From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-lib warnings Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 08:02:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83k02kadbv.fsf@gnu.org> <83a63fap35.fsf@gnu.org> <83bknu8tmo.fsf@gnu.org> <18E95AC5-1FFC-4025-B804-7D70DDB1BD75@gmail.com> <87y1qw2yt4.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qwnJdLQ/8h1FC+l6" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39066"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 25 08:03:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p9L2V-0009uM-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 08:03:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p9L27-0000W2-Pd; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 02:02:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p9L23-0000Vj-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 02:02:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p9L1u-0007AC-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 02:02:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zEJPOEVhiZiQJhRmSYBVdFbWTOohEtsW1MxYssL92aM=; b=hhSHjknCBLctMrrSz+3YFKn9p8 C0sQmTBM7C9h41RnTiSvtWdqmcEjRibqrpB/ZgEcmLobwgb5bX8zrJqac2QesE0EIKq9DTkX1ZoBX 7yTVynd4gxRKi8gt4dhu4zoSbeffJe237BLsIF7ZY7dEZZfqsg8q+2JgAX5CmlwZQyVNJtIo+kIGS RoXxaWOTv62Pyc59yxPfripOovOpkBnub7zEqkqy8iAI8VuISlLUiKFUh1WSrKDKyLVvr8Bu8ev58 H9VWThV4rBrto0JIlTSSEO3If7Kz+/BA/wQO0/91QAyCeKqaOUJ9yuKVLY/8crKdQqTtSyXz8lyTQ /b2i0K8Q==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1p9L1s-0008My-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 08:02:40 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301899 Archived-At: --qwnJdLQ/8h1FC+l6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 08:21:24PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > I find it very interesting how many Emacs Lisp programmers want to use a > > highly functional, Scheme-inspired style -- e.g. the recommendation in > > this thread to use named-let -- despite how the roots of Emacs Lisp are > > highly imperative. >=20 > What can I say, I'm a pure functional programmer at heart (my own > experimental language is pure, statically (and dependently) typed, and > strongly normalizing). To add confusion to this, I'm a somewhat "in between" type and find the Lisps ambiguity quite charming. If I had to describe where I see myself, I'd say "functional in the large, indulging imperatives in the small" or something. That said, I love functional let, so thanks, Stefan :-) Go figure. Cheers --=20 t --qwnJdLQ/8h1FC+l6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCY6f1iAAKCRAFyCz1etHa Ro3NAJ0WpXAege90NMgcJjR//tQSw/t7ZACcClG2ph4Fc0bKLYHmILmVBI7sepI= =2k86 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qwnJdLQ/8h1FC+l6--