From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tree-sitter introduction documentation Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:27:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9eb013da-d0fc-8e17-c6e3-1e8f913aebfa@yandex.ru> <83pmc50xxc.fsf@gnu.org> <71cfe4e8-3bb8-b0a6-9be5-8c0a6d92cfab@yandex.ru> <83h6xg29z3.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn6cyey5.fsf@posteo.net> <787B1EB4-1925-4679-8747-449DCD685432@gmail.com> <87v8lt9lqy.fsf@posteo.net> <87mt759k5w.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KKI3JMGKjqaYfWKq" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3920"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 30 13:39:45 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pBEfp-0000s1-Ps for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:39:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBETl-0005E5-0Y; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 07:27:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBETi-00058A-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 07:27:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBETf-0008L7-T5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 07:27:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QjNAwncZuzZZBGa5B7uSxa1x0S2O89wNhnTi6+SO0HI=; b=SJJkzcTjJvyNAg57zM3tLZ1fqs n7F/VA3BmsAdOZrXbpyRsDHa5QPq+I4qWsfcL6pnRTVkk7u33/8Lq+av3pM4oYZyh45HKwOKNjUEY 7/w3cGljHdssfIPS9AuXPVCIycJa6m68h5R5fXeyDDdySKBXTOEleFfV9VIVBVyma5CSHIFQNBDx1 puLaP+uQg9ucWDTOnFnv7CPAH9AfIlRB6cdniM7SX12ktOCZI2cRmPwQsVKVrQyYoxrYvUwtkadfA DHBa6z2kqFW0qhhbOaZdvcTKBERGyvDM2xcsCYtukInUwRwU13V4WFPeh4yNiT5nmEdXfQGUTiJVL DtwaaTKA==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pBETa-0006Rr-Ff; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:27:06 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mt759k5w.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302098 Archived-At: --KKI3JMGKjqaYfWKq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:59:39AM +0000, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > writes: >=20 > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:25:25AM +0000, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > > > >> If acceptable, it looks good. I could imagine that it should be OK if > >> we point to GitHub, since we are just using it as a Git host. Here are > >> a few suggestions > > > > I won't object, as long as I can excise it with my own > > hands. I don't like to see how That Company silently > > slithers into more and more basic infrastructure. >=20 > What do you mean by "exercise"? Install the rules manually? I said "excise". More traumatic :-) > Perhaps it would be better to download tarballs instead of cloning a > repository of the depth 1? They are easier to configure and usually > faster to download. The result should be the same anyway. Yes, perhaps. Personally, I try as hard as I can to keep a safe distance between github and myself. Probably off-topic here going into too much detail why. Cheers & thanks nevertheless for your hard work :) --=20 t --KKI3JMGKjqaYfWKq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCY67ZFAAKCRAFyCz1etHa Ru8jAJ4+hqculDxStl6y2vOAuNee7730LQCeM7FD61mRIDVxzClcJiduxzZ3G68= =PRum -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KKI3JMGKjqaYfWKq--