From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Make peg.el a built-in library? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 06:07:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <875yvtbbn3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877d07a16u.fsf@localhost> <87tu3asg2r.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87edud25ov.fsf@localhost> <87a6511ku0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wn85z0zl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87leobplpv.fsf_-_@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YPf2bibyaNnq5yV6" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11163"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 16 06:08:01 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ovAeW-0002gC-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 06:08:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovAdq-0007jz-De; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:07:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovAdn-0007jp-JD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:07:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovAdj-0002ys-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:07:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kiPDh7ywpc4oN7LVozic/QTWv+9BF06OgVTM70Yt6Bo=; b=Ap610/4FCsufKbe/iTzhaoijf/ yFyafbcOl/nmG+dSd2yPPcgKbusmjyuKDvaF6CE/ngFZwZN9+Gtw6g2Y4NONr5a/HuGi1K82ntsIp /3XZ9vBSbRbFnAFsPsrSSYNtSvUPkd/aUM7Mhdf6LyJjDg1ab+7U0nUQLy1Ig47MQuq785Zl9ifFh ea5H9SabfHtYE7fpitd00S6rDjx2GMZY/IE35BO3SOXtRkneZponcHWUDeMYfZEjZ7XGrcunp66KN swx8IMWDhidSeWgYBD3dZWua7YpMk7nC+t8wCyvgRRC7UPMvpDb/peuSLoqHyZGI4aYywwI4FvJGC ZL7EDH4w==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovAdc-0006Rw-Rc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 06:07:04 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87leobplpv.fsf_-_@ericabrahamsen.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299898 Archived-At: --YPf2bibyaNnq5yV6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:27:56PM -0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: [...] > Okay, here's a first stab. I read the paper, and understood about half > of it, which seemed like enough. It was interesting to see that the > paper explicitly calls out the exact greedy-matching behavior I'd > encountered. Half of it sounds like double as much as I understood ;-) Seriously: thanks for your work. And thanks to the original authors! > I'm sure I've got some of the conventions wrong, here, and it's > unfortunate that there's already a manual node called "Expression > Parsing", but I don't know what to call this except "Expression Parsing > Grammars"... Hm. Perhaps "Parsing Expression Grammars" might be less confusing, since it is the moniker which has established itself. Admittedly, it grammars a bit awkwardly, but people having seen it once will rather recognize that one. Cheers --=20 t --YPf2bibyaNnq5yV6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCY3Rv8AAKCRAFyCz1etHa Rp+BAJ9t//LAYppN/OvBVJnGnmEpkvLxbgCfUR2ZwW48FNbBbUlTJzOYb8OFWsE= =Ru8S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YPf2bibyaNnq5yV6--