From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Edebug corrupting point in buffers.
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 14:40:18 +0000
Message-ID: <Y2fHUj8oc2t6yc8U@ACM>
References: <Y2KYUNWGkcKo9Ei9@ACM> <83cza59tvg.fsf@gnu.org>
 <Y2OmzWP/2rMmCvyB@ACM> <83wn8c6u96.fsf@gnu.org>
 <Y2QDVM1Rjv4tdIQS@ACM> <83bkpn7vmb.fsf@gnu.org>
 <Y2QjqIJXCm/UCnSP@ACM> <834jvd4pbd.fsf@gnu.org>
 <Y2aUZEbKo095Vk6d@ACM> <83zgd41p1k.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="14595"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 06 15:41:23 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1orgpv-0003cu-QX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 15:41:23 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1orgp6-0004iS-7T; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:40:32 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <acm@muc.de>) id 1orgp1-0004ep-SM
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:40:28 -0500
Original-Received: from mx3.muc.de ([193.149.48.5])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <acm@muc.de>) id 1orgoy-00026K-N1
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 09:40:27 -0500
Original-Received: (qmail 47420 invoked by uid 3782); 6 Nov 2022 15:40:18 +0100
Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p2e5d5417.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.93.84.23]) (using
 STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP;
 Sun, 06 Nov 2022 15:40:18 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 25499 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Nov 2022 14:40:18 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <83zgd41p1k.fsf@gnu.org>
X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix)
X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.149.48.5; envelope-from=acm@muc.de;
 helo=mx3.muc.de
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299254
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/299254>

Hello, Eli.

On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 10:10:31 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 16:50:44 +0000
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>

> > > Instead of continuing this endless argument, I prefer to fix this
> > > myself, using your text where appropriate.  Are you okay with that?

> > Yes, I think that would be best.  Please do take account of my points
> > about the "The Outside Context", and put the phrase "corrupted point" (or
> > something like it) in somewhere.

> Now done.

> (I didn't use the term "corrupt" because I don't think it belongs in a
> manual that describes what a program does.)

I've had a look at the patch.  It seems OK.

Thanks!

I'll close the bug, if you haven't already done so.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).