From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mithraeum Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Performance degradation from long lines Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 02:58:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <665d5f3d84c071632f87f66ffedb6aed@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <1892e3a5b684cf3a822aaf1c78544a99@webmail.orcon.net.nz> Reply-To: mithraeum NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540522582 17358 195.159.176.226 (26 Oct 2018 02:56:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 02:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Phil Sainty Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 04:56:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFsIL-0004Qk-Lu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 04:56:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFsKS-0004nd-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:58:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFsKH-0004mS-Oc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:58:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFsKC-0007o4-Po for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40130.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.130]:59287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFsKC-0007nA-D8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:58:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1540522690; bh=0RcE4+vszVOLsYA7JH96ljfCmMZjU5OwuAxkyKVCg1Q=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=gglSSwPefA+udZXUrYPSLKuM8WfSBSC9PwjCIJIn00osWRKKKTqZsnygBpDsoz4u4 KBswh2GTx8VdPvypVcvpwEhlT4Z2fyQYnWX8AqQZhpKt2Tq+kT9blCxUQTdRSUi+sE qlMhe4ib1UB/43Oy54R1FfCWHtpg1sanS6HtryXk= In-Reply-To: <1892e3a5b684cf3a822aaf1c78544a99@webmail.orcon.net.nz> Feedback-ID: xC_oeWz6JH8P2gZn7Lj2b-XCGuoCWrP5vJcnJIBITi8jaWWW0Er_cElwenRnHDRr1t8z5iqR6bQTnK1M9VLMtg==:Ext:ProtonMail X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.130 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230679 Archived-At: On Thursday, October 25, 2018 7:39 PM, Phil Sainty wrote: > > I would guess that in the case of this second file, the long lines > did not occur until after that default threshold? No. The entire file consisted of one single line.