From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [feature/dll-only-windows] A new windows build, comments wanted Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:04:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87pn2dq3xv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <878s91pzgb.fsf@russet.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7879"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Phillip Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 01:05:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyOEx-0001te-2X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 01:05:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyOEw-0000lJ-4q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 19:05:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyOE6-0008TH-Iv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 19:04:58 -0500 Original-Received: from outbound.soverin.net ([116.202.65.218]:49023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyOE4-0005t5-7N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 19:04:58 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F338060199; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.138]) by soverin.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=idiocy.org; s=soverin; t=1610237093; bh=vcmGESexOYwXHARnFGnzD/dqxG2Xm5IyYNLOpysA6MQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cTRh6+lPhdod82GkUQ0hr32dTIkApRFGXaXQwB+j4VHsWB948f7Ou4XqGid3XFF5j 5Vepx11zuseRqaUvUTLQq0RvfYziS7fUKe7KyVw5fJG0z4wPtHMmLROAVhfygE4gOB /npHQq8Vv6PqMq+04e4LMitim4ZpufqA+iSi4pOKUqyXFePPFo2+0IOPuLGCMIzjpP ZAXYiwrqdJS6CeK9BtkhjjvGNSqpfykKgn0mm3YrLMuiYdXb3a5LLjy09BGOCHPiBn V8pLthX/Kf1DxbT01N4YFINA39YMZ9QcYV8UKElIqobd/G4iquLkCAG5oYc7D6Rd4B OWZPfQTXxKA4g== Original-Received: by breton.holly.idiocy.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 574222029C8160; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:04:49 +0000 (GMT) Mail-Followup-To: Alan Third , Phillip Lord , emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878s91pzgb.fsf@russet.org.uk> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.65.218; envelope-from=alan@idiocy.org; helo=outbound.soverin.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262827 Archived-At: On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 09:33:56PM +0000, Phillip Lord wrote: > Alan Third writes: > > > Do you even really need libXpm? We manage without it on NS and Cairo > > builds by using the built-in functions at src/image.c:4671. Perhaps > > that could be extended to Windows as well? > > I don't think we do need it in the version with deps. AFAIU, it's just > there as the smallest dependency that can give colour icons. Yes, my point is we have colour icons with no deps at all by using functions already in image.c. -- Alan Third