From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kelly Dean Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Is setq-default within a dynamic let-binding supposed to work? Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 03:09:44 +0000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423105891 28973 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2015 03:11:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 03:11:31 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 04:11:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YJCqj-0002pQ-RM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 04:11:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39786 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJCqj-0002OZ-0g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:11:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJCqg-0002OJ-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:11:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJCqV-0001MP-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:11:22 -0500 Original-Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:50485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJCqU-0001Lm-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mfilter15-d.gandi.net (mfilter15-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.143]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3056F41C054 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 04:11:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter15-d.gandi.net Original-Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter15-d.gandi.net (mfilter15-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvGcy0L9zLzy for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 04:11:04 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 66.220.3.179 Original-Received: from localhost (gm179.geneticmail.com [66.220.3.179]) (Authenticated sender: kelly@prtime.org) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27A8041C060 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 04:10:59 +0100 (CET) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4b98:c:538::197 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182421 Archived-At: (let ((foo 'bar)) (setq-default foo 'baz)) foo =E2=86=92 Lisp error: (void-variable foo) Is that behavior correct? Or maybe you're not supposed to do that, and th= e behavior is undefined?