Leo Liu writes: > On 2021-01-15 14:09 +0200, Dmitry Gutov wrote: >> Consider that, when a piece of code is implemented in Lisp, it's >> easier for us "mere mortals" to find it, read, understand and debug >> it. Even more so when it comes to people outside of emacs-devel. > > Eli is not against more elisp. In fact he encourages it. > > His principle is for C code that has been there for decades and is _not_ > broken let us be cautious and make a clear case before moving it to > elisp. > > There could only be good things following this principle. If don't move this, then there is same reason to don't more others. Then don't change any C code which existed for a long time. So the result is don't touch any C code.... A reason like existing for decade time is not a reasonable argument. Should talking technically. An old house existing for decades, should not update it.... because it exists decades. We should talk about why update it. And Dmitry Gutov and Stefa gives clear reason. But you didn't give technical reason. So I think it's not really arguing correctly. Really should stop this. -- [ stardiviner ] I try to make every word tell the meaning that I want to express. Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/ IRC(freenode): stardiviner, Matrix: stardiviner GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3