From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arthur Miller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: empty-directory predicate, native implementation Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 02:03:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87y2kaj799.fsf@gmx.de> <83blh60wgr.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qxjh7g.fsf@gmx.de> <878sc8kgy8.fsf@gmx.de> <87imbcls71.fsf@gmx.de> <83eem0zt0b.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0vsrd6m.fsf@gmx.de> <83a6wozs7h.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgafq2e2.fsf@gmx.de> <87h7qvptm3.fsf@gmx.de> <871rhxp8we.fsf@gmx.de> <87k0vnoio5.fsf@gmx.de> <6b140571-f1ca-4589-9d02-cbd4ff49bf86@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29342"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Michael Albinus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 02:05:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUIfm-0007W2-Cv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 02:05:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46592 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUIfl-0004o8-CL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUIeV-0004Kg-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:03:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-db8eur06olkn2093.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.51.93]:50465 helo=EUR06-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUIeQ-0007Mx-P6; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:03:51 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=O1F/XeEcdNv9dLZ6bDNrLN+60ITFY6JKUjQcNbfBqolzXxYfVlSg6Ujb4JmQZWfjFia7h7PHvO0wKrJtwZc/hDzca/Of4IvMxYsL0HG3LUmWrMxaIzwEJGy63rfnWo8ThJw4thZhaLcLTWsNtRfaqzEaDev/w1+UuHzTXncLvqYCRbLWzkwkY33aYthTrEF6ZfIsWqFcxxip+s5ljMTeWH8NvGe3hdQO+mW0tL3laUS9EL7F/hGOcHFF8vYmXgEKlZAWi5JCvtbtaQduwOx7R7zM2bjBdVzFcv8tpjrVBcqD3LyVI2qSwvPKKxIz5WjRnhuQR72iexovhRvaYkxu8A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=0BvvtLAQ8ezEnKsiMQDXWSdhl2czUmtzjcJbAYBDyGA=; b=eBN9Ik/rjKSzAhJsHAzo7MBWzz975SwXJb4vzKsnnom/Y+yAT9QhuUB3UilDnaQmurNSFUsjXvUt5HPQa5QlDndpaAyFz/LZ4Qgn0EFhFKGkSZotQomBtUCV40FcyGFi18eT3F+IeZjbicGcu7TDswgEhmL8PFbpa/eVW63H6S/cXFN9zegOG2dTfvdyTmWv3+uKeVP1+JgrC0KMv/wgVIqRwsuAUE6dS7CTD3qHa9IrdUZV5HbOT/FSels+5M59Y4B+toKY4+z2zms9DpyeOaqTLEeDM1zD7vuE7/qrd17m882335yHnebQk2jktD/u+eRR5XziyqxENeJG1p96nA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=0BvvtLAQ8ezEnKsiMQDXWSdhl2czUmtzjcJbAYBDyGA=; b=hjOdp0DQzZ7K90ve+IxHqEbZqYUqALEe6bVdnSQDifpcbsCRxXSnF5dwUxcXgagBLmWxIxjrU3cwuHgnlwu4aQHT+qOCasWs8TQTfp84L9lHjUeuYMQDdGzlpW1SXKuQ8j9QYzHe3d1RBW5yGXwS3WVM+wn1eKn5q615ouZCOPG3etyn2W0cLnznsYQdVMqqZRNNsYggnpFFSoLABSpx4UgZKpTr2DM9B7tJ8h18Tyf72Pu76LHB/RfNXl6ft5K7E6zQRHOxrWbzUkStjz/yB3SsCEDwvYOFsibUrghU/hfIv8xFH3w3TLYhrYB5h8TofKf+pCRmYpM8rWZ15RtVyQ== Original-Received: from DB8EUR06FT066.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc35::44) by DB8EUR06HT088.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc35::311) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.21; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:03:38 +0000 Original-Received: from VI1PR06MB4526.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc35::46) by DB8EUR06FT066.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc35::476) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.21 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:03:38 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:2168413E519C0A80A494A31C75774748F3EECC58295265517A165F8FF6DD8937; UpperCasedChecksum:808AB6FECBD8A909E029B7EEB016B6F1B9DC58FE7FE8B8041072CE6C7AE9175E; SizeAsReceived:8478; Count:46 Original-Received: from VI1PR06MB4526.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::187b:196a:cb2d:adf1]) by VI1PR06MB4526.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::187b:196a:cb2d:adf1%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.028; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:03:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: <6b140571-f1ca-4589-9d02-cbd4ff49bf86@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:15:13 -0700 (PDT)") X-TMN: [M3a1WJEgOBMaTkPo2tktL3Vk20SkGVAZ] X-ClientProxiedBy: AM7PR02CA0020.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:100::30) To VI1PR06MB4526.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:ac::17) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <87wnznqdyf.fsf@live.com> X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Original-Received: from pascal.homepc (90.230.29.56) by AM7PR02CA0020.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:100::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.21 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:03:37 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 46 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 79af6ef6-1f82-488a-444c-08d873c26e0c X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DB8EUR06HT088: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 7Mdv3b6YngoCyCzF/IftI9kOT4MbyfUUBdvi0kjXnQspAJlxqKvyf9EJuK5t+SeCjsU6zX6XlzzGQlCNk8MkZpr6JWvHhcfcSRgf7BGR5JWxGJ/H1cpJG3LdBWpeaxVP9hUjSTaRHYyiucXnP3jfR1GvwaOvnMsM3ruK1DOppYnMqmLqmRD0EuJoQYVCGTX5t6oUJVTYlXbtWcOoWiDYnQ== X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: Dms0iojf9oNfNXeUPkz0GJtC1hu2OMh0baYnvFC4/cgylIMg9ami7UGILOs7aUHntrUDW0NbShaXRJwh+SEFkR8zN79I5G+hS9nVAnPgtCjIVD6haHSHaGLuXMf69gYYb7nhb8z1nQtPAPC2nKIY8A== X-OriginatorOrg: live.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 79af6ef6-1f82-488a-444c-08d873c26e0c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2020 00:03:38.6219 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DB8EUR06FT066.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB8EUR06HT088 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=40.92.51.93; envelope-from=arthur.miller@live.com; helo=EUR06-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/18 20:03:39 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Windows NT kernel [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258072 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > FWIW - > > `directory-files-no-dot-files-regexp' was added to Emacs 23. > Its value then was the same as that of `diredp-re-no-dot': > "^\\([^.]\\|\\.\\([^.]\\|\\..\\)\\).*". The value was > changed in Emacs 27, to "[^.]\\|\\.\\.\\.". > > For my purposes (Dired) I want the former, not the latter, > so `diredp-re-no-dot' remains the former. The two behave > quite differently. Do you mind if I ask what is the difference? I have tried now both and I am seemingly getting same results from both. Is there some special case where `directory-files-no-dot-files-regexp' does not work correct?