From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Klimov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Monitoring KeyRelease Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 00:20:55 +0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341609672 2875 80.91.229.3 (6 Jul 2012 21:21:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 21:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , Stefan Monnier To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 06 23:21:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SnFxY-0001Q2-Hf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 23:21:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnFxX-0002cc-BR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnFxU-0002cP-Aj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnFxS-0005Q1-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:20:59 -0400 Original-Received: from 62.128.58.36.static.012.net.il ([62.128.58.36]:48039 helo=mx.eitan.edu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnFxS-0005Os-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:20:58 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx.eitan.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q66LKtld030952; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 00:20:55 +0300 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 62.128.58.36 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151471 Archived-At: On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote: > That would mean that you wouldn't see the key until you release the key > or auto repeat kicks in. That would be quite irritating. I missed the auto-repeat since I never use it, but you are right, it must also be considered. I guess your both points are actually related: the only case where a user presses a key and expects a result before releasing the key, is when he is waiting for auto-repeat. Probably, it can be solved by an option: if allow-extended-modifiers is set, then auto-repeat is disabled (Emacs ignores KeyPress for a key that is already pressed). -- Regards, ASK