From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Hiding *Note:: "tags" in info files
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:14:33 +0200 (IST)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021030161352.12714B-100000@is>
References: <je7kg0xduf.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035987455 4951 80.91.224.249 (30 Oct 2002 14:17:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:17:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Kim F. Storm" <storm@cua.dk>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 186tf2-0001Ha-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:17:32 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 186tkA-0004RO-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:22:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 186td8-0004JS-00; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:15:34 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 186tcL-0003HW-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:14:45 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 186tcI-0003Dt-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:14:45 -0500
Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 186tcH-0003DO-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:14:41 -0500
Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA12907;
	Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:14:33 +0200 (IST)
X-Sender: eliz@is
Original-To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <je7kg0xduf.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8950
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8950


On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> |> That would make sense in many places, but there are also places where
> |> the *Notes are already in a "sensible" textual scope such as
> |> 
> |> 	See *Note Some Topic:: for details.
> 
> This is actually broken to begin with.  If used properly the xref commands
> in texinfo never generate such an output.

Right.  The correct usage ("See @ref...") produces "See *note...", with a 
lower-case `n'.