From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:15:50 +0200 (IST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200210282148.g9SLm2711909@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035873797 22171 80.91.224.249 (29 Oct 2002 06:43:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 186Q5s-0005lT-00 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 07:43:16 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 186QAM-0004gH-00 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 07:47:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 186Pfm-0002FJ-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:16:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 186PfQ-00026K-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:15:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 186PfM-00023x-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:15:55 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 186PfK-000211-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA21991; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:15:50 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <200210282148.g9SLm2711909@rum.cs.yale.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8874 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8874 On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > There is no strong reason, but one of the recent problem I came > across in this area is that process operations don't work properly during > dumping (the handling of sigchld is explicitly not turned on because > it can supposedly prevent unexec from working right). > > That prevents byte-compiling ediff with temacs, for example, because > ediff runs `patch' (IIRC) while loading one of its .el files. Perhaps there's a need for some new `eval-*' form that would not run at dump time?