From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.xemacs.design,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: INFO on add-ons Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 06:48:52 +0200 (IST) Sender: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031201427 1906 127.0.0.1 (5 Sep 2002 04:50:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 04:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, xemacs-design@xemacs.org Return-path: Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org ([207.96.1.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17mob3-0000Uc-00 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 06:50:25 +0200 Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA25855; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 00:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: (from turnbull@localhost) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id AAA20420 for xemacs-design-mailman@xemacs.org; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 00:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: (from mail@localhost) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id AAA20415 for turnbull@tux.org; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 00:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il (is.elta.co.il [199.203.121.2]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA20247 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 00:51:31 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA10521; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 06:48:52 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: X-XEmacs-List: design Errors-To: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org X-BeenThere: xemacs-design@xemacs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of design and features for XEmacs. List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.xemacs.design:1410 gmane.emacs.devel:7514 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7514 On 5 Sep 2002, Miles Bader wrote: > > > What's so great about compared to @kindex C-x k ? > > > What's so great about foobar compared to @sample{foobar} ? > > > > The user base. What do you think is the percentage of the technically > > oriented people, especially "newcomers", that feel more comfortable with > > the former? Why should a "newcomer" who has a choice learn Texinfo if > > she already knows XML? > > I'd guess that the `user base' of XML falls into two camps: > > (1) Those who are afraid of any markup language, and would insist on > using a structure editor or something. These people don't `know > XML'. > > (2) People who actually know XML. These people will pick up > texinfo's syntax in about 35 seconds (both syntaxes are really > almost trivial). Yes. In my experience (with reviewing docs written by others and teaching them basic Texinfo), picking up Texinfo markup is the least of your problems when writing documentation. Especially since Emacs makes it so easy to produce the markup with simple key sequences.