From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.xemacs.design,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: INFO on add-ons Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 15:20:05 +0200 (IST) Sender: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031145714 5420 127.0.0.1 (4 Sep 2002 13:21:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 13:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, xemacs-design@xemacs.org Return-path: Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org ([207.96.1.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ma6S-0001PE-00 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 15:21:53 +0200 Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA30343; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: (from turnbull@localhost) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA29890 for xemacs-design-mailman@xemacs.org; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: (from mail@localhost) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA29884 for turnbull@tux.org; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il (is.elta.co.il [199.203.121.2]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA29852 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:22:44 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA03254; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 15:20:05 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: X-XEmacs-List: design Errors-To: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org X-BeenThere: xemacs-design@xemacs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of design and features for XEmacs. List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.xemacs.design:1384 gmane.emacs.devel:7452 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7452 On 4 Sep 2002, Miles Bader wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > There's no reason why indexing command couldn't be embedded in > > > doc-strings/comments. > > > > Right. However, my point was that coming up with the index entries is > > not a job for a program, it requires human intervention. > > Sure, but since the `automatic' step I was talking was transforming > doc-strings/comments -> info nodes, embedding such commands would avoid > the problem of automatic index generation. Yes, but that means we need to go over all the doc strings and add the indexing commands. A lot of work.