From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:20:54 +0200 (IST)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020902181936.10949A-100000@is>
References: <20020902081336.3E79.LEKTU@terra.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030983831 11715 127.0.0.1 (2 Sep 2002 16:23:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17ltzS-00032q-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 18:23:50 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17luXk-0002iq-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 18:59:16 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17lu0w-0001N2-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:25:22 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17ltzK-0001MW-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:23:42 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17ltzD-0001KM-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:23:42 -0400
Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17ltzD-0001Jg-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:23:35 -0400
Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA10967;
	Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:20:54 +0200 (IST)
X-Sender: eliz@is
Original-To: Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es>
In-Reply-To: <20020902081336.3E79.LEKTU@terra.es>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7332
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7332


On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Juanma Barranquero wrote:

> On Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:59:58 +0300, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il> wrote:
> 
> > Ah, sorry, I wasn't aware of that (you didn't show the file created
> > by the command, so I was confused).
> 
> Uh? In my example, the "for" redirects to test.txt, and the bat file
> then "types" the contents of test.txt surrounded by rows of "=" to
> differentiate any other posible output from the contents of test.txt.

Yes, but when everything is shown together, and the output describes a 
bug, it's hard to be sure that the "===" delimiters are indeed 
trustworthy.
> > Does it help to put the redirection at the beginning of the command,
> > like below?
> 
> I'll try it at home ASAP. Thanks.

Thank you.