From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 07:15:56 +0200 (IST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020831201438.49D3.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030857525 25288 127.0.0.1 (1 Sep 2002 05:18:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 05:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17lN8G-0006Zl-00 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 07:18:44 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17lNfq-0003yu-00 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 07:53:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17lN9k-00015A-00; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 01:20:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17lN8F-000144-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 01:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17lN88-00013s-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 01:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17lN87-00013m-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 01:18:36 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA25188; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 07:15:56 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20020831201438.49D3.LEKTU@terra.es> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7237 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7237 On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > @echo off > del test.txt > for %%i in (*.*) do echo "%%i" >> test.txt > echo ========================== > type test.txt > echo ========================== > > Running it in a directory with files file[1-3].bat gives: > > ========================== > "FILE2.BAT" > "TEST.TXT" > "FILE1.BAT" > "FILE3.BAT" > ========================== > > However, substituting the "for" with: > > for %%i in (*.*) do if 1==1 echo "%%i" >> test.txt > > the result is now: > > "TEST.TXT" > "FILE1.BAT" > "FILE3.BAT" > ========================== > "FILE2.BAT" > ========================== Is this really directly related to the actual problem? What I see in the example is that writes to the screen are out of order; how does this explain the problem with the build which I thought was caused by the list of files beaing shorter than it should have been?