From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate? Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:02:28 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87bs8f8dh7.fsf@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028696662 8436 127.0.0.1 (7 Aug 2002 05:04:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 05:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17cIzd-0002Bx-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 07:04:21 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17cJL5-0004CM-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 07:26:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17cJ0K-0007J2-00; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 01:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17cJ03-0007Ij-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 01:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA17203; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:02:28 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: John Paul Wallington In-Reply-To: <87bs8f8dh7.fsf@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6323 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6323 On 7 Aug 2002, John Paul Wallington wrote: > Maybe `eshell-under-cygwin-p' should be called something else? What difference in behavior is that test supposed to handle? Perhaps there's a cleaner way of taking care of that problem.