From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reporting UTF-8 related problems? Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:18:18 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207311226.VAA08114@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028179234 1981 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2002 05:20:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 05:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17a8O1-0000Vq-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 07:20:33 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17a8gY-0003u0-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 07:39:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17a8OU-0003Dv-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 01:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17a8O5-0003Di-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 01:20:37 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA20944; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:18:19 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: <200207311226.VAA08114@etlken.m17n.org> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6217 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6217 On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Kenichi Handa wrote: > So, how about calling xselect-convert-to-string with > TARGET-TYPE nil in the latter case? This can be done by > adding one more arg LOCAL-REQUEST to x_get_local_selection. > > If the above analysis is correct, we can implement the > rather sensitive/delicate code for handling string in > lisp_data_to_selection_data and x_encode_text in Lisp, which > makes the Emacs' reaction to selection request more flexible > and also makes the future maintanance easier. > > What do you think? I think it's a good idea.