From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: customize Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:14:29 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028006578 1951 127.0.0.1 (30 Jul 2002 05:22:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jeff.dwork@amd.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZPTF-0000VM-00 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 07:22:57 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZPko-0002if-00 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 07:41:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZPTb-0003Su-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZPNU-0002kU-00 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA27842; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:14:30 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Edward Welbourne In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6163 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6163 On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Edward Welbourne wrote: > Having customize add everything it does to a single file, maintained > entirely via the customize UI, loaded at a well-considered moment in > one's start-up sequence, will provide for tidier source-management, > easier maintenance, better control over the start-up process, less > opportunity for any bugs in customize to manifest themselves and > probably less bugs in initialisation. I suspect that the problem of where exactly in the startup sequence to load that separate file, i.e. the problem of choosing that ``well-considered moment'' is no less complicated than the ones you find in the current operation of the code.