From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: desktop.el problem [Re: X-Symbol 4.0e; Emacs port (fwd)] Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 08:18:45 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207250247.LAA28221@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027574535 19390 127.0.0.1 (25 Jul 2002 05:22:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 05:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: christoph.wedler@sap.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Xb4n-00052X-00 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 07:22:13 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17XbJw-0001p2-00 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 07:37:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Xb50-0002cW-00; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 01:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Xb3k-0002Y4-00 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 01:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA20660; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 08:18:45 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: <200207250247.LAA28221@etlken.m17n.org> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6027 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6027 On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Kenichi Handa wrote: > Another workaround is not to save such strings that contains > a characters of newly defined charsets. > > What do people think? I prefer the latter method because > the former method is not robust. It won't be able to deal > with the situation that a user defines a charset in his > .emacs before .emacs.desktop is loaded. > > By the way, emacs-unicode won't have this problem. If this problem is temporary, until the Unicode Emacs is released, perhaps we just need to have an entry in PROBLEMS explaining the limitation. It might also be a good idea to have desktop.el display a warning when it detects such characters in some string it's about to save.