From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:10:10 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207202207.g6KM7ux29310@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027228407 21890 127.0.0.1 (21 Jul 2002 05:13:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 05:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: d.love@dl.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17W926-0005gx-00 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 07:13:26 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17W9FJ-0002fc-00 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 07:27:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17W922-00074t-00; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17W913-00074I-00; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA08814; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:10:10 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Richard Stallman In-Reply-To: <200207202207.g6KM7ux29310@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5940 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5940 On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Richard Stallman wrote: > If all you're proposing for right now is a feature freeze on the > trunk, the question is, do we want one now? I don't think so. > I would like to get the GDB enhancements in. If a feature freeze is being considered, I'd suggest that every developer who works on something tell what that is, so that the decision whether or not to freeze could be based on more data.