From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: non-ASCII cut/paste emacs <-> mozilla Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:37:35 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026794493 23514 127.0.0.1 (16 Jul 2002 04:41:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 04:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17UK9S-000679-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:41:30 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17UKKD-0003Je-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:52:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UK9G-0008Bg-00; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:41:18 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UK7k-00087q-00; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:39:45 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA17115; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:37:36 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5773 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5773 On 16 Jul 2002, Miles Bader wrote: > Interestingly enough, if I cut the above `$(B3NG'(B' > gibberish out of mozilla, and paste _that_ into emacs, it looks correct > in emacs! So mozilla is apparently just pasting the raw encoded > characters from X, without interpretation. Yes, it looks like a ctext-encoded string. You can verify that by setting a breakpoint in x_encode_text and looking at the string it is about to send to X. Weird. What system is that?