From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More .cvsignore entries? Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:21:15 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026750324 18228 127.0.0.1 (15 Jul 2002 16:25:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17U8f5-0004jt-00 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:25:23 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17U8pb-0003Kv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:36:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17U8ez-0005GM-00; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17U8dk-0005CD-00 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA12172; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:21:15 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: "Robert J. Chassell" In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5767 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5767 On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Robert J. Chassell wrote: > RMS wrote > > emacs-vol*.texi are missing. > > Those files may have been renamed > > vol*.texi > > some time in the past couple of years to make the name short enough > for some systems. Yes. > emacs/lispref/vol*.texi > > exist on my system and they look like what I think we originally > called emacs-vol*.texi. Yes.