From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:43:10 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207090219.g692Jl003979@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026193610 28365 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2002 05:46:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 05:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rnpq-0007NO-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 07:46:50 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rny7-00029j-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 07:55:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RnpA-0001Rh-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 01:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RnoO-0001LP-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 01:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA12145; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:43:10 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Jon Cast In-Reply-To: <200207090219.g692Jl003979@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5590 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5590 On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Jon Cast wrote: > > This might be a good idea. (I would probably start at -10 rather > > than -99.) > > I agree. However, IMO the first pretest should be -20 or -30 rather > than -10 --- from what I understand, Emacs 21 went up to pretest 106 > from 90, which makes 17 pretests. I'd suggest -30 or even -40 for major releases. Then you have the flexibility to bump from -30 to -20 if the number of problems in -30 is not large. This corresponds to what was used in the past: major releases started with a .70 or even .65 minor-minor version.