From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should lisp/Makefile.in custom-deps be using EMACS or emacs? Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:06:45 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87heja5mdi.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026144583 1590 127.0.0.1 (8 Jul 2002 16:09:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rb55-0000PX-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 18:09:43 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17RbD6-0000Q0-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 18:18:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rb4b-0001aP-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 12:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rb4J-0001ZF-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 12:08:56 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA07085; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:06:45 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87heja5mdi.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5573 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5573 On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Rob Browning wrote: > Could I just use $(emacs) in preference to $(EMACS) in that > Makefile.in for the debian packages? Yes, of course, I don't see why not.