From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should lisp/Makefile.in custom-deps be using EMACS or emacs? Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:56:06 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87k7o86ycp.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026136767 14561 127.0.0.1 (8 Jul 2002 13:59:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17RZ31-0003mk-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 15:59:27 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17RZAz-0005sT-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 16:07:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RZ35-0004qw-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 09:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RZ22-0004nu-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 09:58:26 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA05704; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:56:06 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87k7o86ycp.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5568 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5568 On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Rob Browning wrote: > I'm on starting to learn the details in lisp/Makefile.in, but I was > surprised when my changes to lisp/custom-deps.el didn't seem to be > having an effect on a "make custom-deps". After looking at > lisp/Makefile.in, I wondered if the $(EMACS) $(EMACSOPT) in the > custom-deps target might ought to be $(emacs) instead so that > EMACSLOADPATH=$(lisp) would be in effect. Is there any other way to solve your particular problem? Some non-Unix platforms have problems with using $(emacs), so from my perspective it's best to leave $(EMACS) $(EMACSOPT) wherever possible.