From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 07:57:35 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207022022.g62KMQP19228@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025672386 3519 127.0.0.1 (3 Jul 2002 04:59:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 04:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17PcF0-0000ue-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 06:59:46 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17PcKL-0007FI-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 07:05:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PcFK-0008SX-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 01:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PcEy-0008Lk-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 00:59:45 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA18396; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 07:57:35 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Jon Cast In-Reply-To: <200207022022.g62KMQP19228@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5387 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5387 On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Jon Cast wrote: > 2. Texinfo does the same thing. > [...] > As for 2, I doubt as many people follow Texinfo as follow Emacs Note that Texinfo was only an example; there are others. File/Text/Sh-utils, for example. > that the Texinfo development is as important as Emacs > development IMHO, Texinfo is one of the more important GNU packages. But I might be biased, since I contribute regularly to its maintenance.