From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:52:04 +0300 (IDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020625185111.3988A-100000@is>
References: <87elev9y9o.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025020631 11246 127.0.0.1 (25 Jun 2002 15:57:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:57:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Msgo-0002vH-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:57:10 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17MsiW-0005Le-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:58:56 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Msgw-0005Ge-00; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:57:18 -0400
Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Msdz-00053z-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:54:15 -0400
Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA04019;
	Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:52:04 +0300 (IDT)
X-Sender: eliz@is
Original-To: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
In-Reply-To: <87elev9y9o.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5198
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5198


On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Rob Browning wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> 
> > That's true, but some of the differences are not just order differences.  
> > For example, scroll-bar doesn't appear in one custom-load, and 
> > gnus-article-x-face-command doesn't appear in the non-X version at all.
> 
> Yep, I noticed that.  So is this is a difference that's supposed to
> exist between the X and non-X versions?  If so, then is there a way we
> could (and would want to) fix this to allow the two versions to
> coexist peacefully?

I tend to think that cus-load should not depend on the configuration 
options, unless doing so would cause trouble.