From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NT Emacs make problem.. Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:55:46 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200206121313.g5CDDiU17859@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023944476 2712 127.0.0.1 (13 Jun 2002 05:01:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17IMjU-0000hd-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:01:16 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17IN7c-0002ad-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:26:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17IMiU-0001JH-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 01:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17IMg4-000161-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:57:44 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA25685; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:55:46 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <200206121313.g5CDDiU17859@rum.cs.yale.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4813 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4813 On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > BTW, I've recently changed the `-k' setting of loaddefs.el to `-kb' Yes, I noticed. -kb also means that the nasty problems with Windows CVS clients that convert newlines to CR-LF pairs won't happen again. > I haven't checked to see if I've made the change > correctly and if CVS implements it correctly, tho. It works for me, even on Windows (where text vs binary files are always a mess).