From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:36:15 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87it4qanwt.fsf@wesley.springies.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023773966 18615 127.0.0.1 (11 Jun 2002 05:39:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 05:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rob Browning , emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17HeNK-0004q8-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:39:26 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17HekV-0005Vz-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:03:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HeN4-0002N3-00; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 01:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HeMC-0002JR-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 01:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA03072; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:36:15 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Alan Shutko In-Reply-To: <87it4qanwt.fsf@wesley.springies.com> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4741 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4741 On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Alan Shutko wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > Please show us the diff, since any difference is a bug. > > Ok. Turns out it's very small. Indeed. It sounds like adding fontset.o to SOME_MACHINE_OBJECTS on src/Makefile.in should fix that. Can you try? I think we also saw similar problems with the Windows port, so perhaps someone who can build a Windows version could compare the DOC file with the Unix version, and see whether more files are missing from the respective lists in src/Makefile.in.