From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs misbehaves without --unibyte Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:06:58 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022670005 11198 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2002 11:00:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 11:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@etl.go.jp, Paul Stoeber Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17D1BV-0002uV-00 for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 13:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17D1Tm-0001ob-00 for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 13:18:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17D0h7-0001eM-00; Wed, 29 May 2002 06:28:41 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17D0Nr-0006vd-00; Wed, 29 May 2002 06:08:48 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA02070; Wed, 29 May 2002 13:06:58 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4480 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4480 On 29 May 2002, Miles Bader wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Should we perhaps make no-conversion be the default value of > > file-name-coding-system, instead of nil? > > I presume you mean, if there's no language environment. Yes. For some reason, many systems have file-name-coding-system set to nil by default (I never had time to find out why), which is bad mantra. > Then people > will always see non-ascii characters in filenames as octal escapes, > which I guess is the best that can be done... If they use standard-display-8bit, they might even see non-ASCII characters instead.