From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please pretest Emacs 21.3 Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 14:04:23 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022497736 21922 127.0.0.1 (27 May 2002 11:08:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 11:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17CIMx-0005hT-00 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 13:08:55 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17CIeG-0004fg-00 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 13:26:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17CINP-0002u5-00; Mon, 27 May 2002 07:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17CIKY-0002io-00 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 07:06:26 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA09548; Mon, 27 May 2002 14:04:23 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4428 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4428 On Mon, 27 May 2002, Andreas Schwab wrote: > You just have to remove the branch tags from the files that are not > supposed to be on the branch. There are no files on the branch that aren't supposed to be there. My problem is only with directories. > |> If someone can tell how to persuade CVS not to make lispref visible on > |> the branch, I'd be grateful. > > The directory itself will always be visible, unless you use "cvs update > -P" to let cvs prune it. Thanks. This is a user-level command; I thought there was some way of doing it for everyone, by issuing some CVS command once.