From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL doesn't always recognize rmail-mime-charset-pattern Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 19:02:53 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200205201447.g4KElt625368@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021910940 24194 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2002 16:09:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dvdkhlng@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@etl.go.jp Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 179piV-0006I7-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 18:08:59 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 179pwW-0002PV-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 18:23:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179pij-0001p7-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 12:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179pfZ-0001aI-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 12:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA29765; Mon, 20 May 2002 19:02:53 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Richard Stallman In-Reply-To: <200205201447.g4KElt625368@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4192 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4192 On Mon, 20 May 2002, Richard Stallman wrote: > Just the opposite--it is right for Rmail to read a Babyl file this way, > since they are supposed to be saved as a whole using a single coding system. IIRC, Babyl files saved by Emacs are read by a different branch of code in rmail-convert-to-babyl. They don't need to be decoded by decode-coding-region because they take the encoding from the X-Coding-System: header inserted by the initial conversion. But I agree that changing movemail to save the mailbox in mbox format will solve the problem in a nicer manner.