From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:32:57 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200204300522.BAA05824@sbcs.cs.sunysb.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020145017 3921 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2002 05:36:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 05:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, gerd@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 172QJt-000118-00 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:36:57 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 172QNz-00033b-00 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:41:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172QJc-0002ll-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 01:36:40 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172QHe-0002KN-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 01:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA04135; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:32:58 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Michael Kifer In-Reply-To: <200204300522.BAA05824@sbcs.cs.sunysb.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3448 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3448 On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Michael Kifer wrote: > What was the exact symptom of that problem? The symptoms were that ChangeLog got recoded in Latin-1, but the coding: cookie still said iso-2022-7bit. That's a recipe for trouble.