From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:35:44 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020141590 32061 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2002 04:39:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 04:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: keichwa@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 172PQc-0008L0-00 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 06:39:50 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 172PUh-0001l5-00 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 06:44:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172PQ5-00055M-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:39:17 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172POS-00051A-00 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:37:36 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA03341; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:35:44 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Simon Josefsson In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3431 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3431 On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Emacs 21.3 will be released from the branch, so it cannot have Dave's > > code. This will have to wait until the first release from the current > > CVS head. > > If this is so, shouldn't the ":version" `defcustom' parameters I just > proposed in the patch to lisp/mail/smtpmail.el and > lisp/mail/sendmail.el be changed to "21.4" or whatever the next > version will be that will include the fixes? Yes. > The :version parameter > seem to require that there exists a release plan for future releases > so it is possible to add the correct information. The trouble with release plans is that they tend to change ;-) Seriously, though: we are just learning how to deal with branches. I guess this issue is part of the learning process. Suggestions for solutions are welcome.