From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Addressing email (was: kill ring menu) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:10:32 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1020058652.27106.353.camel@space-ghost> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020077845 5996 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2002 10:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 1728qT-0001Yb-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:57:25 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1728uC-0002xO-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:01:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1728Br-0003Ky-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 06:15:27 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17288f-0002ze-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 06:12:09 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA25344 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:10:32 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1020058652.27106.353.camel@space-ghost> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3394 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3394 On 29 Apr 2002, Colin Walters wrote: > If that isn't true, then I have to spend time deleting lots of duplicate > messages. A second or two per message is not so bad. It's a minor inconvenience, hardly worth any action, let alone action that could have adverse effects. > If someone posts who *isn't* > subscribed, then the onus is on *them* to say "Please CC me". That's not a good idea, I think: people will forget and get thrown out of the discussion they started. I don't think we should treat subscribers' convenience any different than that of others.