From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bindings reserved for users Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:13:16 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200204250605.g3P65tj03752@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019729756 6247 127.0.0.1 (25 Apr 2002 10:15:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jas@extundo.com, Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170gI8-0001ce-00 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:15:56 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 170gKF-00068U-00 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:18:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170gI0-0004fa-00; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:15:48 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170gGv-0004ZI-00; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:14:41 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA20439; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:13:16 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Richard Stallman In-Reply-To: <200204250605.g3P65tj03752@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3244 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3244 On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Richard Stallman wrote: > Is there a style guide that says "i.e." should not be followed > by a comma? It seems like my memory betrayed me: I thought that "i.e." shouldn't be followed by a comma, but now I see that the Texinfo manual does follow it with a comma. Sorry for any confusion I might have caused.