From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: init_buffer PWD fix Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:12:44 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019643406 28261 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2002 10:16:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, knagano@sodan.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170JpO-0007Li-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:16:46 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 170Jr0-0007HF-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:18:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170JpF-0007B0-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170JnP-00074o-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:14:43 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA08349; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:12:45 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: MIYASHITA Hisashi In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3168 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3168 On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, MIYASHITA Hisashi wrote: > Windows dose not have symbolic link and if the current directory > permission dose not allow to enter, we cannot invoke any programs. True for now. But suppose we introduce into Emacs support for Cygwin-style symlinks some day--are we supposed to go through all the primitives and invent Windows-specific code to handle that? I think computing a simulated inode for a directory is much simpler, and will work for a broader class of potential changes in the underlying filesystem and in Emacs. The code already exists, it just needs to be activated by removing the #if 0 conditional. I fail to understand why are we still arguing...