From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bindings reserved for users Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:49:03 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019541089 27895 127.0.0.1 (23 Apr 2002 05:51:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 05:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16ztD6-0007Fo-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:51:28 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16ztE9-0002KE-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:52:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16ztCy-0003Wn-00; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 01:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16ztCJ-0003Ur-00; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 01:50:39 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA23574; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:49:04 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Simon Josefsson In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3075 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3075 On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Simon Josefsson wrote: > "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > > >> What is the correct way to typeset "i.e." in Texinfo source code? > > > > "i.e.@:". Without the "@:" part, TeX might typeset the second period > > as an end of a sentence (slightly more whitespace). > > Or rephrasing it to say "foo, i.e., bar". A comma after "i.e." is wrong punctuation, AFAIK. > At least I have learned to do that when writing "e.g.". Yes. But "e.g." is a different thing, it does require a comma. > (The Cc line of this mail look really weird. Whose mailer is broken? Mine :-( Or, more accurately, some interaction between RMAIL's `r' command and feedmail I use to send the message. I need to find time to debug the problem...