From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: init_buffer PWD fix Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:53:47 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200204220618.g3M6Icg23696@sic.twinsun.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019458650 20847 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2002 06:57:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 06:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: knagano@sodan.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zXlR-0005Q8-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:57:29 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16zXm2-0004wS-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:58:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zXl7-00008G-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 02:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zXjG-000066-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 02:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA12605; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:53:47 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Paul Eggert In-Reply-To: <200204220618.g3M6Icg23696@sic.twinsun.com> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2982 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2982 On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Paul Eggert wrote: > PWD is unreliable on all platforms, but Emacs works around the problem > with a similar method on all platforms by statting $PWD and ".", and > using $PWD only if stat results agree. What is the problem with > this workaround on Windows? The problem is probably what you'd guess: the inode comparison doesn't work on Windows as well as it does on Posix platforms... But even so, I still don't see how this would cause a failure.