From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:38:48 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200204152159.g3FLxbj23728@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019104950 10009 127.0.0.1 (18 Apr 2002 04:42:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 04:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ulrich@a0.complang.tuwien.ac.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16y3kc-0002bK-00 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:42:30 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16y43d-0006O9-00 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 07:02:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16y3kH-00048b-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16y3iI-0003wb-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA02941; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:38:48 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Richard Stallman In-Reply-To: <200204152159.g3FLxbj23728@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2716 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2716 On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Richard Stallman wrote: > I see two possible solutions: > > - hardcode a few more special characters, like ISO8859-x NBSP and a > few Unicode characters; > > For now, I think we should do it that way. Perhaps the char-table implementation suggested by Handa-san is better. It is certainly easier to customize by users, so it's more flexible.