From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug#142608: emacs21: please apply flyspell patch from preview-latex package Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:25:48 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018935014 15690 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2002 05:30:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 05:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16xLXi-00044x-00 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 07:30:14 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16xLpl-0001VM-00 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 07:48:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xLXe-0005Qp-00; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 01:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xLUj-0005Kx-00; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 01:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA14601; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:25:49 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2654 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2654 On 16 Apr 2002, David Kastrup wrote: > I would first have to get developer access to GNU Emacs, I am > registered as "dak" at Savannah and have signed all the necessary > papers. I can set you up for write access to the CVS tree, if you want. > However, since the HEAD branch of Emacs has had those particular bugs > fixed for perhaps half a year now (and still has), I would really be > surprised if the fixes (or their supersession by larger changes taking > them into account) would not already be present in RC. RC got only safe fixes for grave bugs, so it's possible that it doesn't have those changes. Can you check and say for sure? (You don't need write access for this; anon CVS will do.) > IIRC, 21.3 was > not supposed to be mere bug fixes as compared to 21.2, was it? Originally, yes; but we've changed our minds, since 21.2 has a small number of annoying bugs, some of them cause crashes and similar nuisance. So now it is planned to make 21.3 out of the RC branch.