From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unify on encoding Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:10:36 +0200 (IST) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200203181433.g2IEXH128844@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016467965 15101 127.0.0.1 (18 Mar 2002 16:12:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16mzkb-0003vT-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:12:45 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16mzpa-0001yi-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:17:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16mzkP-0006mX-00; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:12:33 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16mzjV-0005t1-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:11:37 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA10237; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:10:37 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <200203181433.g2IEXH128844@rum.cs.yale.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2009 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2009 On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Since this user option has not been introduced in any release yet, > I fail to see why this would be considered as "removing user option". I'm guessing that quite a few people are using the CVS version nowadays, so the option was, in a certain sense, ``released''. But you are right that it's less grave than if it were present in a released version. > Instead I think it's a mistake to introduce this new user option since > there's no reason to ever turn off the feature. I think we don't know yet if there is a reason to turn that off. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel